lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:21:44 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	jolsa@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf mem: add priv level filtering support

On 8/26/13 7:11 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> perf mem: add priv level filtering support
>
> This patch adds the -u -and -k options to perf to allow
> filtering of load/store sampling based on priv levels.
> This may not be supported by all HW platforms.
>
> By default, loads/stores are sampled at both user and
> kernel privilege levels.
>
> To sample only at the user level:
> $ perf mem -u -t load rec ......
>
> To sample only at the kernel level:
> $ perf mem -k -t load rec ......
>
> Man page updated accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
> index 888d511..4c4e405 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
> @@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ OPTIONS
>   	option can be passed in record mode. It will be interpreted the same way as perf
>   	record.
>
> +-k::
> +	Only sample loads/stores at the user level (default: user + kernel)
> +
> +-u::
> +	Only sample loads/stores at the kernel level (default: user + kernel)

Are the descriptions backwards? In the commit message yuo have -u means 
user level and -k means kernel level; the help message here seems backwards.

David


> +
>   SEE ALSO
>   --------
>   linkperf:perf-record[1], linkperf:perf-report[1]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> index 706a1fa..8ac9d1e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
> @@ -9,13 +9,18 @@
>   #define MEM_OPERATION_LOAD	"load"
>   #define MEM_OPERATION_STORE	"store"
>
> -static const char	*mem_operation		= MEM_OPERATION_LOAD;
> +#define OP_LOAD		0x1
> +#define OP_STORE	0x2
> +
>
>   struct perf_mem {
>   	struct perf_tool	tool;
>   	char const		*input_name;
>   	bool			hide_unresolved;
> +	const char		*mem_op;
>   	bool			dump_raw;
> +	bool			user;
> +	bool			kernel;
>   	const char		*cpu_list;
>   	DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_bitmap, MAX_NR_CPUS);
>   };
> @@ -25,35 +30,88 @@ static const char * const mem_usage[] = {
>   	NULL
>   };
>
> -static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
> +static inline const char *get_plm(struct perf_mem *mem)
> +{
> +	const char *plm = "";
> +
> +	if (mem->user && !mem->kernel) {
> +		plm = "u";
> +	} else if (!mem->user && mem->kernel) {
> +		plm = "k";
> +	}
> +	return plm;
> +}
> +
> +static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
>   {
>   	int rec_argc, i = 0, j;
>   	const char **rec_argv;
> -	char event[64];
> -	int ret;
> +	char *str;
> +	int mode = 0;
> +	int ki, ret;
> +
> +
> +	if (!strcmp(mem->mem_op, MEM_OPERATION_STORE))
> +		mode |= OP_STORE;
> +	else if (!strcmp(mem->mem_op, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
> +		mode |= OP_LOAD;
> +	else  {
> +		fprintf(stderr, "unknown sampling mode: %s\n", mem->mem_op);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
>
> -	rec_argc = argc + 4;
> +	rec_argc = argc + 6;
>   	rec_argv = calloc(rec_argc + 1, sizeof(char *));
>   	if (!rec_argv)
>   		return -1;
>
>   	rec_argv[i++] = strdup("record");
> -	if (!strcmp(mem_operation, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
> -		rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-W");
> +
>   	rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-d");
> -	rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-e");
>
> -	if (strcmp(mem_operation, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
> -		sprintf(event, "cpu/mem-stores/pp");
> -	else
> -		sprintf(event, "cpu/mem-loads/pp");
> +        if (mode & OP_LOAD) {
> +                rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-W");
>
> -	rec_argv[i++] = strdup(event);
> -	for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, i++)
> -		rec_argv[i] = argv[j];
> +                rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-e");
> +
> +                str = malloc(strlen("cpu/mem-loads/pp") + 1 + 1);
> +                if (!str) {
> +                        ki = i;
> +                        ret = -1;
> +                        goto end;
> +                }
> +                sprintf(str, "cpu/mem-loads/%spp", get_plm(mem));
> +                rec_argv[i++] = str;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (mode & OP_STORE) {
> +                rec_argv[i++] = strdup("-e");
> +
> +                str = malloc(strlen("cpu/mem-stores/pp") + 1 + 1);
> +                if (!str) {
> +                        ki = i;
> +                        ret = -1;
> +                        goto end;
> +                }
> +                sprintf(str, "cpu/mem-stores/%spp", get_plm(mem));
> +                rec_argv[i++] = str;
> +        }
> +
> +        /* arguments after i are not malloc'd */
> +        ki = i;
>
> -	ret = cmd_record(i, rec_argv, NULL);
> +	for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, ki++)
> +		rec_argv[ki] = argv[j];
> +
> +	ret = cmd_record(ki, rec_argv, NULL);
> +
> +end:
> +	/*
> +	 * XXX: free rec_argv[] entries, difficult because
> +	 * cmd_record() drops some of them...
> +	 */
>   	free(rec_argv);
> +
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
> @@ -171,7 +229,7 @@ static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
>   	 * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
>   	 * the column
>   	 */
> -	if (strcmp(mem_operation, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
> +	if (strcmp(mem->mem_op, MEM_OPERATION_LOAD))
>   		rep_argv[i++] = strdup("--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
>   				       "dso_daddr,tlb,locked");
>
> @@ -199,7 +257,7 @@ int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>   		.input_name		 = "perf.data",
>   	};
>   	const struct option mem_options[] = {
> -	OPT_STRING('t', "type", &mem_operation,
> +	OPT_STRING('t', "type", &mem.mem_op,
>   		   "type", "memory operations(load/store)"),
>   	OPT_BOOLEAN('D', "dump-raw-samples", &mem.dump_raw,
>   		    "dump raw samples in ASCII"),
> @@ -213,13 +271,18 @@ int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>   		   "separator",
>   		   "separator for columns, no spaces will be added"
>   		   " between columns '.' is reserved."),
> +	OPT_BOOLEAN('u', "user-level", &mem.user,
> +		    "include user-level accesses"),
> +	OPT_BOOLEAN('k', "kernel-level", &mem.kernel,
> +		    "include kernel-level accesses"),
>   	OPT_END()
>   	};
>
>   	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, mem_options, mem_usage,
>   			     PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
>
> -	if (!argc || !(strncmp(argv[0], "rec", 3) || mem_operation))
> +	if (!argc || !(strncmp(argv[0], "rec", 3)
> +		       || strncmp(argv[0], "rep", 3)))
>   		usage_with_options(mem_usage, mem_options);
>
>   	if (!mem.input_name || !strlen(mem.input_name)) {
> @@ -228,9 +291,12 @@ int cmd_mem(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
>   		else
>   			mem.input_name = "perf.data";
>   	}
> +	/* default to load only, some processors only support loads */
> +	if (!mem.mem_op)
> +		mem.mem_op = MEM_OPERATION_LOAD;
>
>   	if (!strncmp(argv[0], "rec", 3))
> -		return __cmd_record(argc, argv);
> +		return __cmd_record(argc, argv, &mem);
>   	else if (!strncmp(argv[0], "rep", 3))
>   		return report_events(argc, argv, &mem);
>   	else
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ