| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <521C2BA7.2010705@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:31:35 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ 00/74] 3.10.10-stable review On 08/26/2013 06:07 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.10 release. > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu Aug 29 01:03:56 UTC 2013. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.10-rc1.gz > and the diffstat can be found below. > Cross build results: total: 85 pass: 85 fail: 0 Compared to 3.10.8: total: 76 pass: 76 fail: 0 qemu tests: arm, microblaze, mips, mips64, ppc, x86, x86_64: pass (boot to login prompt) Note that the arm qemu test now passes because I found a workaround for the bug causing the failure observed with the previous release, not because the bug was fixed. More builds, more platforms tested, still no failures. Results look good. Details: http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists