linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 13/20] mm, hugetlb: mm, hugetlb: unify chg and avoid_reserve to use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130827075753.GB6795@lge.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:57:53 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/20] mm, hugetlb: mm, hugetlb: unify chg and
 avoid_reserve to use_reserve

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 06:39:35PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> writes:
> 
> > Currently, we have two variable to represent whether we can use reserved
> > page or not, chg and avoid_reserve, respectively. With aggregating these,
> > we can have more clean code. This makes no functinoal difference.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 22ceb04..8dff972 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -531,8 +531,7 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> >
> >  static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
> >  				struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > -				unsigned long address, int avoid_reserve,
> > -				long chg)
> > +				unsigned long address, bool use_reserve)
> >  {
> >  	struct page *page = NULL;
> >  	struct mempolicy *mpol;
> > @@ -546,12 +545,10 @@ static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
> >  	 * A child process with MAP_PRIVATE mappings created by their parent
> >  	 * have no page reserves. This check ensures that reservations are
> >  	 * not "stolen". The child may still get SIGKILLed
> > +	 * Or, when parent process do COW, we cannot use reserved page.
> > +	 * In this case, ensure enough pages are in the pool.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (chg && h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
> > -		return NULL;
> 
> This hunk would be much easier if you were changing. 
> 
> 	if (!vma_has_reserves(vma) &&
> 			h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
> 		goto err;
> 
> ie, !vma_has_reserves(vma) == !use_reserve.
> 
> So may be a patch rearragment would help ?. But neverthless. 

I think that current form is better since use_reserve is not same as
vma_has_reserves(). I changed the call site of vma_has_reserves() to chg in
previous patch. In this patch, use_reserve in alloc_huge_page is made
by chg and avoid_reserve and is passed to dequeue_huge_page_vma(). So changing
in dequeue_huge_page_vma() is trivial.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/