linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 26/33] ARM: ux500: Remove AUXDATA relating to SDI (MMC) clock-name bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130827081109.GD6152@lee--X1>
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:11:09 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/33] ARM: ux500: Remove AUXDATA relating to SDI (MMC)
 clock-name bindings

On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Friday 23 August 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > (...)
> > >         /* Requires DMA bindings. */
> > >         OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl022", 0x80002000, "ssp0",  &ssp0_plat),
> > > -       OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80126000, "sdi0",  &mop500_sdi0_data),
> > > -       OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80118000, "sdi1",  &mop500_sdi1_data),
> > > -       OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80005000, "sdi2",  &mop500_sdi2_data),
> > > -       OF_DEV_AUXDATA("arm,pl18x", 0x80114000, "sdi4",  &mop500_sdi4_data),
> > 
> > This cannot be done. Ulf H would beat me up if I applied this.
> > 
> > The platform data there in the end is actually used.
> > 
> > Especially look at mop500_sdi0_data, it contains a lot of stuff that is
> > not yet DT:ed even (a task in its own right).
> > 
> > But as long as we keep this pdata we can still delete ATAGs support (as
> > per the second patch set pending) and get a clearer picture.
> 
> Which parts of mop500_sdi0_data are not yet converted? I thought it was all covered
> months ago.

Well it would have been if you hadn't have stopped my CAPs patch. ;)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/