[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130827190304.c3f2f891f20d078d66b703b1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:03:04 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with Linus' tree
Hi Mike,
Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in
drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c between commits 252957cc3a2d ("clk/zynq/clkc: Add
dedicated spinlock for the SWDT") and 765b7d4c4cb3
("clk/zynq/clkc: Add CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag to ethernet muxes") from
Linus' tree and commit 819c1de344c5 ("clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT
flag") from the clk tree.
I fixed it up (see below and in a couple of places I chose
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT over CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, which may, of course,
be wrong) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
index 089d3e3,e05c9e3..0000000
--- a/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/zynq/clkc.c
@@@ -293,8 -294,9 +295,9 @@@ static void __init zynq_clk_setup(struc
swdt_ext_clk_mux_parents[i + 1] = dummy_nm;
}
clks[swdt] = clk_register_mux(NULL, clk_output_name[swdt],
- swdt_ext_clk_mux_parents, 2, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
- SLCR_SWDT_CLK_SEL, 0, 1, 0, &swdtclk_lock);
+ swdt_ext_clk_mux_parents, 2, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
+ CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT, SLCR_SWDT_CLK_SEL, 0, 1, 0,
- &gem0clk_lock);
++ &swdtclk_lock);
/* DDR clocks */
clk = clk_register_divider(NULL, "ddr2x_div", "ddrpll", 0,
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists