[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521CB239.6050409@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:05:45 +0200
From: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the usb tree
On 27/08/2013 16:02, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 03:57 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>> + Kevin,
>>
>> On 27/08/2013 15:53, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> What do we do now?
>>
>> Cannot you just merge the stable arm-soc/dt branch into your branch
>> before applying your patches?
>
> That is up to Greg. This changes sat in his usb-next tree for a while
> now. And before they hit Greg they were in Felipe's tree for a while.
>
> To be exact, last .dts change via USB was:
>
> Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> AuthorDate: Thu Jun 20 12:13:04 2013 +0200
> Commit: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> CommitDate: Fri Aug 9 17:40:16 2013 +0300
>
> usb: musb dma: add cppi41 dma driver
Mmm, if that branch is supposed to be stable, I'm not sure it will be
doable...
Maybe we should do the other way around? And merge usb-next into arm-soc/dt.
Kevin, Olof?
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists