[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521CC4E3.8030204@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:25:23 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
CC: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the usb tree
On 08/27/2013 05:01 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> What do we do now?
>>
>> Cannot you just merge the stable arm-soc/dt branch into your branch
>> before applying your patches?
>
> Unfortunately, the next/dt branch of arm-soc is not necessarily stable
> so should *not* be merged. In fact none of the arm-soc branches should
> be considered stable.
>
> As was already mentioned, this should be split up into driver changes
> and DTS changes through arm-soc. They'll both merge for v3.12.
But splitting will break the driver until .dts & code is in sync again.
> BTW, how did this patch get merged without a signoff/ack from the OMAP
> DT maintainer in the first place? Hmm, looks like Benoit was not copied
> nor was linux-omap or linux-arm-kernel copied in the original mails.
Hmm. I had Benoit's okay [0] to do the change "as long as Felipe is
fine with it". I indeed forgot to Cc Benoit on the dts changes.
For the phy-rename Felipe pinged you and we did the topic-branch, here
I forgot.
>
> Kevin
[0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg88423.html
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists