linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130827180917.GA12212@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:09:17 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:52:09PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ata: acpi: Remove ata_dev_acpi_handle stub in libata.h
> 
> The ata_dev_acpi_handle is defined in libata-acpi.c and the only
> external user is libata-zpodd.c, which is built when CONFIG_ATA_ACPI
> is set, so there is no need to make an empty stub function for
> !CONFIG_ATA_ACPI case in libata.h. It also causes compile errors due to
> acpi_handle is not defined when !CONFIG_ACPI. This patch fixes this
> problem by removing the empty stub.
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>

Yeap, tested and works.  Applied to libata/for-3.12.  Thanks.

Stephen, sorry about the trouble.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/