[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52896c00-6711-4558-9754-e1bba1f81078@email.android.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:49:08 -0500
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Updated stolen mem patches
If noone hers to them first poke me tomorrow. On an aircraft right now.
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:32:50PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> These address the comments I've received so far, but omit the new
>E820
>> type for this mem.
>>
>> Chris's patches could go on top if desired; they add a new type and
>> resource reservation function for looking up regions by name. That
>> allows us to remove some duplicate code in the driver for finding
>stolen
>> space.
>>
>> But I think these two are ready as-is. How should we merge them?
>Just
>> through the i915 tree since the first one touches our headers? that
>and
>> there probably won't be conflicts on the early-quirks file; that's
>not
>> touch too often...
>
>Just noticed that these patches aren't in -next yet - somehow I've
>thought
>they'd go in in through the x86 tree.
>
>Ingo et al: Should I merge these through drm-intel-next or will you
>pick
>them up?
>
>Thanks, Daniel
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists