[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130827160150.36f10869@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:01:50 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/10] tracing: Add support for SOFT_DISABLE to
syscall events
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:40:13 -0500
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
return;
> - if (!test_bit(syscall_nr, tr->enabled_enter_syscalls))
> +
> + /* Here we're inside the tp handler's rcu_read_lock (__DO_TRACE()) */
> + ftrace_file = rcu_dereference_raw(tr->enter_syscall_files[syscall_nr]);
What's the reason for using rcu_dereference_raw() and not normal
rcu_dereference?
-- Steve
> + if (!ftrace_file)
> + return;
> +
> + if (test_bit(FTRACE_EVENT_FL_SOFT_DISABLED_BIT, &ftrace_file->flags))
> return;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists