[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAODwPW8KG2ZxOFf936H233g35KVPjDp+f8e3qgkd4Z7NN9RAtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:27:48 -0700
From: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v5] usb: phy-samsung-usb: Simplify PMU register handling
*Ping!*
Are there still unanswered concerns left with this patch? I hope my
prior mails could clear up why I think that the PMU register
description in the device tree for a specific PHY is represents the
hardware more accurately after my patch, and my analysis of the
Exynos4 situation currently not being implemented (and therefore not
needing to be addressed by this patch) was correct. Please let me know
if you have further objections... and if not, could we agree to have
this picked up somewhere?
Thanks,
Julius
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists