linux-kernel - Re: Bcache fixes for stable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 17:47:43 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Cc:	stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bcache fixes for stable

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:23:33PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:19:57PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:02:49PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > Two fixes that went into 3.11 should've been marked for stable, but I
> > > screwed up and forgot to mark them.
> > > 
> > > One of them fixes bugs that appear to being hit in the wild, so please
> > > pull these:
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit 0a4b6d4ff200a553951f77f765971cb3e4c91ec0:
> > > 
> > >   Linux 3.10.9 (2013-08-20 15:40:47 -0700)
> > > 
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > 
> > >   git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git bcache-for-3.10
> > > 
> > > for you to fetch changes up to a213846fafcdf52153dfebf8b1671498a72b6285:
> > > 
> > >   bcache: FUA fixes (2013-08-26 14:56:52 -0700)
> > > 
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Kent Overstreet (1):
> > >       bcache: FUA fixes
> > > 
> > > Kumar Amit Mehta (1):
> > >       md: bcache: io.c: fix a potential NULL pointer dereference
> > 
> > Can I get a hint as to what the git commit ids of these patches are in
> > Linus's tree?
> 
> 5c694129c8db6d89c9be109049a16510b2f70f6d
> e49c7c374e7aacd1f04ecbc21d9dbbeeea4a77d6
> 
> > Ideally, that's all you need to send me, but if you want to send me a
> > git pull, that's fine too, but please use a signed tag, otherwise it's
> > just a random tree...
> 
> *nod* I need to get some more signatures on my gpg key...
> 
> > Also, if you do a git pull, I need the git commit ids in the changelog
> > entry that match Linus's tree, so people (like me) can verify things.
> 
> Ok, I'll remember that for the future.
> 
> > For now, I can edit these two patches and add them in, if you give me
> > the git commit ids to verify them.
> 
> Ok - I don't care too much either way but there were some slightly
> nontrivial conflicts on the second patch, and the one I did backported
> has been tested.

Thanks, I took your second patch, and the first patch directly from
Linus's tree, and added them to the 3.10-stable queue.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/