lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7tne+NvO-idW8Dt-9FZaGOHjTEDcQ8mC6K1PG6M=ftvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:34:11 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ACPI: Fix osc flag setup ordering to allow pcie
 hotplug use when available

[+cc Stefan]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> Somewhere between 3.9 and 3.10 it seems the order in which pcie and acpi probed
> slots for hotplug capabilites got reversed.  While this isn't a big deal, it did
> uncover a bug in the ACPI bus setup path.  Specifically, acpi_pci_root_add calls
> pci_acpi_scan_root before setting the osc flags for the device handle.
> pci_acpi_scan_root, among other things uses device_is_managed_by_native_pciehp()
> to determine if a given slot has pcie hotplug capabilties, whcih checks the
> devices OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL flag.  Since that flag is not set
> until after pci_acpi_scan_root_completes, the acpi code never sees that pcie
> slots are hotplug capable and configures them all to use acpi instead.

I'd like to make it more explicit what we're fixing.  Apparently this
is a regression between v3.9 and v3.10.

Is this a fix for problems like
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736 ?  That bug is that
an ExpressCard slot doesn't work unless we boot with
"acpiphp.disable=1".  I think what happens there is that acpiphp
claims the slot before we run _OSC, so pciehp doesn't claim it, even
though _OSC did grant us control over native PCIe hotplug.

> Fix is pretty simple, just defer the scan until after the osc flags have been
> set on the device.  Tested by myself and it seems to work well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> CC: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> CC: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
> Change notes:
> v2) eferred the disabling of aspm until after the acpi scan of the pci bus is
> complete.  This was done to allow proper handling of pcie 1.1 devices, as per:
>
> commit b8178f130e25c1bdac1c33e0996f1ff6e20ec08e
> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Date:   Mon Apr 1 15:47:39 2013 -0600
>
>     Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"
>
> As discussed previously in the thread the disable logic for aspm needs to be
> untangled and refactored, which is not something I'm sufficently versed in teh
> hotplug code to do right now, but this fixes the problem above, and prevents the
> problem that necessitated the revert without adding any visible complexity to
> the user, so I think its ok.
>
> v3) Fixup stupid authorship error
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 5917839..1e80a90 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>         struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>         u32 flags, base_flags;
>         acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> +       bool no_aspm = false;
>
>         root = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_pci_root), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!root)
> @@ -437,27 +438,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>         flags = base_flags = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
>         acpi_pci_osc_support(root, flags);
>
> -       /*
> -        * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> -        */
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Scan the Root Bridge
> -        * --------------------
> -        * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
> -        * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
> -        * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
> -        */
> -       root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> -       if (!root->bus) {
> -               dev_err(&device->dev,
> -                       "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> -                       root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> -               result = -ENODEV;
> -               goto end;
> -       }
> -
> -       /* Indicate support for various _OSC capabilities. */
>         if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
>                 flags |= OSC_EXT_PCI_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
>         if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled()) {
> @@ -512,7 +492,14 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                                 acpi_format_exception(status), flags);
>                         dev_info(&device->dev,
>                                  "ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM\n");
> -                       pcie_no_aspm();
> +                       /*
> +                        * We want to disable aspm here, but aspm_disabled
> +                        * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
> +                        * properly handle pcie 1.1 devices.  So we set this
> +                        * flag here, to defer the action until after the acpi
> +                        * root scan
> +                        */
> +                       no_aspm = true;
>                 }
>         } else {
>                 dev_info(&device->dev,
> @@ -520,6 +507,29 @@ static int acpi_pci_root_add(struct acpi_device *device,
>                          "(_OSC support mask: 0x%02x)\n", flags);
>         }
>
> +       /*
> +        * TBD: Need PCI interface for enumeration/configuration of roots.
> +        */
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Scan the Root Bridge
> +        * --------------------
> +        * Must do this prior to any attempt to bind the root device, as the
> +        * PCI namespace does not get created until this call is made (and
> +        * thus the root bridge's pci_dev does not exist).
> +        */
> +       root->bus = pci_acpi_scan_root(root);
> +       if (!root->bus) {
> +               dev_err(&device->dev,
> +                       "Bus %04x:%02x not present in PCI namespace\n",
> +                       root->segment, (unsigned int)root->secondary.start);
> +               result = -ENODEV;
> +               goto end;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (no_aspm)
> +               pcie_no_aspm();
> +
>         pci_acpi_add_bus_pm_notifier(device, root->bus);
>         if (device->wakeup.flags.run_wake)
>                 device_set_run_wake(root->bus->bridge, true);
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ