[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521D1D16.9080106@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:41:42 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....de>
CC: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2] documentation/devicetree: Move DT bindigns from
gpio to watchdog
On 08/27/2013 05:10 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> I accidently put the devicetree bindings for the MEN A21 watchdog driver in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio instead of
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog, this patch addresses this error.
> Changes to v1:
> - Use named gpios, as suggested by Stephen Warren
The move and the change to the binding should probably be separate
patches since they're logically separate things. I didn't intend you to
update the rename patch to fix the binding issue I pointed out.
Is the driver updated for this binding change? Are there DTs in released
kernels that won't work now, or is the driver very new; there may be a
need for the driver to support the old binding and the binding doc to
document the old gpios property, but mark it deprecated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists