[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3837b119-baad-4e68-8805-2bc52c0135f9@DB9EHSMHS031.ehs.local>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:19:46 -0700
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...inux.com>, <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/16] ARM: call clk_of_init from time_init
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Most DT ARM machs require common clock providers initialized before timers.
> Currently, arch/arm machs use .init_time to call clk_of_init right before
> clocksource_of_init. This prevents to remove that hook and use the default
> hook instead. clk_of_init is safe to call for non-DT platforms, so add
> the call to ARM arch time_init by default. While at it, also reorder includes
> alphabetically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1->v2:
> - reorder includes alphabetically
>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: kernel@...inux.com
> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/time.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> index 98aee32..dd1028e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/time.c
> @@ -11,25 +11,26 @@
[ ... ]
> void __init time_init(void)
> {
> + /* initalize common clocks before timers */
> + of_clk_init(NULL);
> +
> if (machine_desc->init_time)
> machine_desc->init_time();
> else
This forces zynq to move some initialization our clock code relies on to
init_irq(). Also, the current code already takes an approach of
doing either common init or machine specific init.
I think it might be better to move the call to of_clk_init() down into
the else branch of the if-else.
Though, this probably contradicts the purpose of the whole series.
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists