[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130827010431.264813035@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 18:08:30 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [ 32/74] tracing: trace_remove_event_call() should fail if call/file is in use
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
commit 2816c551c796ec14620325b2c9ed75b9979d3125 upstream.
Change trace_remove_event_call(call) to return the error if this
call is active. This is what the callers assume but can't verify
outside of the tracing locks. Both trace_kprobe.c/trace_uprobe.c
need the additional changes, unregister_trace_probe() should abort
if trace_remove_event_call() fails.
The caller is going to free this call/file so we must ensure that
nobody can use them after trace_remove_event_call() succeeds.
debugfs should be fine after the previous changes and event_remove()
does TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER, but still there are 2 reasons why we need
the additional checks:
- There could be a perf_event(s) attached to this tp_event, so the
patch checks ->perf_refcount.
- TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER can be suppressed by FTRACE_EVENT_FL_SOFT_MODE,
so we simply check FTRACE_EVENT_FL_ENABLED protected by event_mutex.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130729175033.GB26284@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 2 +-
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ extern int trace_define_field(struct ftr
const char *name, int offset, int size,
int is_signed, int filter_type);
extern int trace_add_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
-extern void trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
+extern int trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call);
#define is_signed_type(type) (((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1735,16 +1735,47 @@ static void __trace_remove_event_call(st
destroy_preds(call);
}
+static int probe_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
+{
+ struct trace_array *tr;
+ struct ftrace_event_file *file;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+ if (call->perf_refcount)
+ return -EBUSY;
+#endif
+ do_for_each_event_file(tr, file) {
+ if (file->event_call != call)
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * We can't rely on ftrace_event_enable_disable(enable => 0)
+ * we are going to do, FTRACE_EVENT_FL_SOFT_MODE can suppress
+ * TRACE_REG_UNREGISTER.
+ */
+ if (file->flags & FTRACE_EVENT_FL_ENABLED)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ break;
+ } while_for_each_event_file();
+
+ __trace_remove_event_call(call);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* Remove an event_call */
-void trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
+int trace_remove_event_call(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
{
+ int ret;
+
mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
down_write(&trace_event_sem);
- __trace_remove_event_call(call);
+ ret = probe_remove_event_call(call);
up_write(&trace_event_sem);
mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
+
+ return ret;
}
#define for_each_event(event, start, end) \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists