[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130828092943.GA14094@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:29:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Improve preempt-scheduling and x86 user access v3
* Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> Various optimizations related to CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY and x86
> uaccess
Looks mostly good.
Does this patchset change the number of cond_resched() preemption points
on CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y, or is it a scheduling invariant?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists