[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130828095315.GG10783@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:53:15 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Padmavathi Venna <padma.v@...sung.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] ASoC: Samsung: Do not queue cyclic buffers
multiple times
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:06:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> If patch 1 thru 9 are uncontroversial now, maybe Vinod can apply
> these for v3.12 so we can get less noise and risk of collissions
> in the next merge window?
Patch 9 I was going to apply to ASoC towards the end of the release
cycle - it shouldn't depend on the earlier ones as ASoC isn't using
dmaengine yet. Holding off partly to run testing and partly in case
this ends up getting applied.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists