linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: ti_am335x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130828104211.GB14111@linutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:42:11 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Zubair Lutfullah <zubair.lutfullah@...il.com>
Cc:	jic23@....ac.uk, lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: ti_am335x_tsc: Enable shared IRQ for TSC

* Zubair Lutfullah | 2013-08-25 23:45:23 [+0100]:

>diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
>index e1c5300..4124e580 100644
>--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
>+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ti_am335x_tsc.c
>@@ -315,11 +321,17 @@ static irqreturn_t titsc_irq(int irq, void *dev)
> 	}
> 
> 	if (irqclr) {
>-		titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS, irqclr);
>-		am335x_tsc_se_update(ts_dev->mfd_tscadc);
>-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
>+		titsc_writel(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS, (status | irqclr));
>+		am335x_tsc_se_set(ts_dev->mfd_tscadc, ts_dev->step_mask);
> 	}
>-	return IRQ_NONE;
>+
>+	/* If any IRQ flags left, return none. So ADC can handle its IRQs */
>+	status = titsc_readl(ts_dev, REG_IRQSTATUS);
>+	if (status == false)
>+		return IRQ_HANDLED;
>+	else
>+		return IRQ_NONE;

If I understand this correctly you return IRQ_NONE the TSC interrupt has
been handled and no ADC interrupt is outstanding.
This is bad because if you received 1k _only_ TSC interrupts you return
always IRQ_NONE and the irq-core will disable the interrupt line. You
don't want this.

Now, if you handle an interrupt at the TSC level and return IRQ_HANDLED
then the second handler, the ADC in your case, is also invoked.
So you can drop this and return IRQ_HANDLED if you *did* something here
and NONE if didn't do anything.

Basides that, I'm fine with it.

>+
> }

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/