[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1377648836.2335.252.camel@rzhang-lenovo>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:13:56 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
Peter Feuerer <peter@...e.net>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drivers: thermal: make usage of
CONFIG_THERMAL_HWMON optional
On 二, 2013-08-27 at 23:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 02:26:41 PM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > On 23-08-2013 19:08, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 23, 2013 06:03:14 PM Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > >> When registering a new thermal_device, the thermal framework
> > >> will always add a hwmon sysfs interface.
> > >>
> > >> This patch adds a flag to make this behavior optional. Now
> > >> when registering a new thermal device, the caller needs
> > >> to say if the hwmon interface is required.
> > >>
> > >> In order to keep same behavior as of today, all current
> > >> calls will by default create the hwmon interface.
> > >
> > > Well, instead of modifying all of the callers this way, why don't
> > > you add new versions taking the additional argument as, for example,
> > >
> > > thermal_zone_device_register_full()
> > >
> > > and redefine the old ones as static inline wrappers, for example
> > >
> > > static inline struct thermal_zone_device *thermal_zone_device_register(args)
> > > {
> > > return thermal_zone_device_register_full(args, true);
> > > }
> > >
> > > ?
> >
> > Yeah, that is another way to go and I thought of doing it like that. I
> > just could not come out with a good API naming:
> >
> > thermal_zone_device_register_full(all args)
> >
> > thermal_zone_device_register(args) /* on hwmon == true */
> > thermal_zone_device_register_no_hwmon(args) /* on hwmon == false */
> >
> > Would this sound reasonable naming?
>
> Yeah, sounds good to me.
>
Well, actually, Tianyu is working on a patch set to move all the
thermal_zone_device_register() parameters to struct thermal_zone_params.
But with that patch set done, what you need to do next is just to
introduce a new field in struct thermal_zone_params and make sure 0
means registering hwmon sysfs I/F.
thanks,
rui
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists