linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf trace: Add option to analyze events in a file versus live

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:09:37 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf trace: Add option to analyze events in a file
 versus live

On 8/28/13 7:02 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:52:14PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> Allows capture of raw_syscall:* events and analyzed at a later
>> time.
>>
>> +-r
>> +--replay
>> +	Process events from a given perf data file.
>
> Shouldn't this be just -i/--input, like for 'report', 'annotate', etc?
>
> - Arnaldo
>

uh, arguably. But -i == inherit per a prior patch. record (-i = inherit) 
/ report (-i = input file) collision.

I have used this a bit over the last 2 days and -r is not logical. How 
about -f / --file?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/