[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5BiE7tqja9p51gOGEwtWsKjyX23qZ3=ewyuubMwsgXcLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:39:11 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] imx-drm: Fix probe failure
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> Nack. We need the references to prevent that encoders/connectors are
> (de)registered while the device is active. Simply dropping this code is
> no solution.
Any suggestions about a proper way of handling this?
After b5dc0d10, imx_drm_device_get() is called from
imx_drm_driver_load(), which increments the 'references' very early
now.
Then when we check:
if (imxdrm->references) {
ret = -EBUSY;
goto err_busy;
}
,it will fail always.
Not sure where is a proper location to increment/decrement
'imxdrm->references' though.
Tried to look at other drm drivers, but could not find examples on how
to deal with such references.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists