linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] xHCI: Fixing xhci_readl definition and function call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <521E3044.80109@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:45:48 +0530
From:	Kumar Gaurav <kumargauravgupta3@...il.com>
To:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xHCI: Fixing xhci_readl definition and function call

On Wednesday 28 August 2013 10:31 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:39:06PM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
>> On Wednesday 28 August 2013 12:43 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 07:38:57AM +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
>> I've started cloning linux-next and as it's not applying on
>> linux-next, I'll try it on linux-next (once i cloned it)  and will
>> send again.
> Yeah, this doesn't apply against Greg's usb-next tree, so I can't take
> it.  If you're sending non-bug fixes in, you need to base your patches
> against that tree, or linux-next.
>
> Sarah Sharp
I'm trying against linux-git as
     cat 0027-xHCI-Fixing-xhci_readl-definition-and-function-call.patch| 
patch
and then after i enter the required file (drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c).
it's giving me  message

File to patch: drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c
patching file drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbg.c
can't find file to patch at input line 180
Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:

but when i saw the file i found changes are applied there.

I had made the patch using git format-patch. what could be the possible 
reason behind this issue or am i mistaking somewhere?


Regards
Kumar Gaurav



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/