[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1308282104000.6397@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 21:07:52 +0100
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] xen/arm,arm64: enable SWIOTLB_XEN
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 12:10 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > At the moment always rely on swiotlb-xen, but when Xen starts supporting
> > hardware IOMMUs we'll be able to avoid it conditionally on the presence
> > of an IOMMU on the platform.
>
> Do we have any idea how we are going to do this?
>
> It's extra complicated if you consider that on some systems on some of
> the devices are behind an IOMMU :-/
>
> I wonder if we can enumerate which devices have an IOMMU at boot time
> and force a ludicrous dma mask (such as 0) if one isn't present in order
> to force us to always take the exchange_and_pin path?
We don't need to worry about how to specify which devices need to go via
the swiotlb internally, because we have our own arm specific
dma_map_ops. At the moment they are just implemented using the
swiotlb-xen functions, but we could easily provide wrappers that check
our own internal whitelist/blacklist and go via swiotlb-xen only in
those cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists