[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130828132550.d0ce4d3a4d40ee07e7e8a1c1@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:25:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Cc: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
lf-virt <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com> wrote:
> Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
Looks reasonable.
> lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
I still don't think it should be in this file.
You say that some as-yet-unmerged patches will tie the new code into
the old ida code. But will it do it in a manner which requires that
the two reside in the same file?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists