linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARC: Fix _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1377758224.1928.91.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Wed, 28 Aug 2013 23:37:04 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc:	Mischa Jonker <Mischa.Jonker@...opsys.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@...ecosm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARC: Fix __udelay parentheses

On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 06:24 +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I think the whole thing is odd and it should simply be
> >
> >	loops = loops_per_jiffy * usecs_to_jiffies(usecs)
[]
> On the topic of multiply vs. divide (which probably is not relevant to topic at
> hand though), since ARCompact doesn't have native divide, we end up emulating it
> using libgcc routines. That makes it slightly non-deterministic (not a big deal)
> and also adds to boot time (which those delays sprinkled all over the place in
> crazy device probes and such). Seriously we got hammered by a customer for that once.

That argues more for reducing the uses of hard delays
than making the hard delay count calculation simpler.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/