[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130829103732.426fdfdeb3da0c3c209f132c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 10:37:32 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: status of the memblock tree
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:28:09 -0400 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:34:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > I was wondering if the memblock tree needs to exist any more. The last
> > commit to it was in December 2011 and was merged into Linus' tree during
> > the v3.3 merge window.
>
> After the rewrite was complete, the tree was never used. I think it
> can be put to rest now. Ingo is routing all memblock changes now.
I have removed it.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists