[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1377779927-28500-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:38:47 -0600
From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] net: neighbour: Remove CONFIG_ARPD
This config option is superfluous in that it only guards a call
to neigh_app_ns(). Enabling CONFIG_ARPD by default has no
change in behavior. There will now be call to __neigh_notify()
for each ARP resolution, which has no impact unless there is a
user space daemon waiting to receive the notification, i.e.,
the case for which CONFIG_ARPD was designed anyways.
Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
---
Eric's suggestion to simply remove the config option makes sense
to me. If acceptable then I'll submit a patch series that also removes
CONFIG_ARPD from the various arch defconfigs.
net/core/neighbour.c | 2 --
net/ipv4/Kconfig | 16 ----------------
net/ipv4/arp.c | 2 --
net/ipv6/ndisc.c | 2 --
4 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index 60533db..6072610 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -2759,13 +2759,11 @@ errout:
rtnl_set_sk_err(net, RTNLGRP_NEIGH, err);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
void neigh_app_ns(struct neighbour *n)
{
__neigh_notify(n, RTM_GETNEIGH, NLM_F_REQUEST);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(neigh_app_ns);
-#endif /* CONFIG_ARPD */
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
static int zero;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/Kconfig b/net/ipv4/Kconfig
index 37cf1a6..05c57f0 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/Kconfig
+++ b/net/ipv4/Kconfig
@@ -259,22 +259,6 @@ config IP_PIMSM_V2
gated-5). This routing protocol is not used widely, so say N unless
you want to play with it.
-config ARPD
- bool "IP: ARP daemon support"
- ---help---
- The kernel maintains an internal cache which maps IP addresses to
- hardware addresses on the local network, so that Ethernet
- frames are sent to the proper address on the physical networking
- layer. Normally, kernel uses the ARP protocol to resolve these
- mappings.
-
- Saying Y here adds support to have an user space daemon to do this
- resolution instead. This is useful for implementing an alternate
- address resolution protocol (e.g. NHRP on mGRE tunnels) and also for
- testing purposes.
-
- If unsure, say N.
-
config SYN_COOKIES
bool "IP: TCP syncookie support"
---help---
diff --git a/net/ipv4/arp.c b/net/ipv4/arp.c
index 4429b01..7808093 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/arp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/arp.c
@@ -368,9 +368,7 @@ static void arp_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
} else {
probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes;
if (probes < 0) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
neigh_app_ns(neigh);
-#endif
return;
}
}
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
index 04d31c2..d5693ad 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
@@ -663,9 +663,7 @@ static void ndisc_solicit(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb)
}
ndisc_send_ns(dev, neigh, target, target, saddr);
} else if ((probes -= neigh->parms->app_probes) < 0) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARPD
neigh_app_ns(neigh);
-#endif
} else {
addrconf_addr_solict_mult(target, &mcaddr);
ndisc_send_ns(dev, NULL, target, &mcaddr, saddr);
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists