[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130829161217.GK10783@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:12:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Dove: Add the audio devices in DT
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:26:31PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> Unfortunately, mvebu-audio has already been taken by Mark. Also, we
> know the differences for the three SoCs now and should have a compatible
> for each (and maybe mvebu-audio for fallback).
We're not at the merge window yet so we can always change it. We can
also add additional compatible strings to the drivers at any point - the
device can list as many as it likes, this is useful if you've got new
controllers which are supersets of old ones for example.
> Also, we'll need to distinguish between the different audio controllers
> on a single SoC, i.e. i2s0 and i2s1. I suggest checking the (phys) reg
> base passed.
Why is this required - ideally this would have been mentioned in some of
the previous reviews...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists