[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130829181052.GA8697@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:10:52 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
jwboyer@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 08/10] kexec: Disable at runtime if the kernel
enforces module loading restrictions
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:26:09PM -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> kexec permits the loading and execution of arbitrary code in ring 0, which
> is something that module signing enforcement is meant to prevent. It makes
> sense to disable kexec in this situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
> ---
> kernel/kexec.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
> index 59f7b55..1a7690f 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> @@ -1645,6 +1646,9 @@ int kernel_kexec(void)
> goto Unlock;
> }
>
> + if (secure_modules())
> + return -EPERM;
> +
Hi Matthew,
Why do disallow this at run time. To me denying this at kexec_load() time
sounds better. Otherwise a user will think that I loaded crash kernel
successfully and when crash actually happens, we never capture the
crash dump.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists