[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7272744.lhUaaLc3cm@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:28:28 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Zhang <zhangwm@...vell.com>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: coupled: abort idle if pokes are pending
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 06:41:47 PM Colin Cross wrote:
> Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com> reported a lockup on Tegra20 caused
> by a race condition in coupled cpuidle. When two or more cpus
> enter idle at the same time, the first cpus to arrive may go to the
> ready loop without processing pending pokes from the last cpu to
> arrive.
>
> This patch adds a check for pending pokes once all cpus have been
> synchronized in the ready loop and resets the coupled state and
> retries if any cpus failed to handle their pending poke.
>
> Retrying on all cpus may trigger the same issue again, so this patch
> also adds a check to ensure that each cpu has received at least one
> poke between when it enters the waiting loop and when it moves on to
> the ready loop.
>
> Reported-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> Tested-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Still stable material I suppose?
Queued up for 3.12, thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists