linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless update of refcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1377751465.4028.20.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Thu, 29 Aug 2013 14:44:25 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
	"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless
 update of refcount

On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 18:40 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Just FYI: I've merged two preparatory patches in my tree for the whole
> lockref thing. Instead of applying your four patches as-is during the
> merge window, I ended up writing two patches that introduce the
> concept and use it in the dentry code *without* introducing any of the
> new semantics yet.
> 
> Waiman, I attributed the patches to you, even if they don't actually
> look much like any of the patches you sent out. And because I was
> trying very hard to make sure that no actual semantics changed, my
> version doesn't have the dget_parent() lockless update code, for
> example. I literally just did a search-and-replace of "->d_count" with
> "->d_lockref.count" and then I fixed up a few things by hand (undid
> one replacement in a comment, and used the helper functions where they
> were semantically identical).
> 
>  You don't have to rewrite your patches if you don't want to, I'm
> planning on cherry-picking the actual code changes during the merge
> window.

I've somewhat lost track of this, will I need some arch support for
powerpc ?

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/