[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegv18PCygsnpYXNLv6mD+Lff9dbVwtoV4OCbzjftc8HVAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:59:11 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Anand Avati <avati@...hat.com>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KONISHI Ryusuke <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] [RFC v2] safely drop directory dentry on failed revalidate
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
>> The check in waitq.c above "is" used to validate the need to callback to
>> the daemon to request a mount.
Okay. But then shouldn't the check be "if (d_mountpoint(dentry)) valid = 0;" ?
Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists