[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130830114309.GW6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:43:09 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> On 29/08/13 15:55, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> > From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
> >
> > This patch series adds support to configure the rate and enable the
> > event stream for architected timer. The event streams can be used to
> > impose a timeout on a wfe, to safeguard against any programming error
> > in case an expected event is not generated or even to implement
> > wfe-based timeouts for userspace locking implementations. This feature
> > can be disabled(enabled by default).
> >
> > Since the timer control register is reset to zero on warm boot, CPU
> > PM notifier is added to save and restore the value.
> >
> Hi Russell,
>
> Can you have a look at this series ?
> If you are OK, can I have your ACK on arm specific changes(PATCH 2/5) ?
I think it would be more value to have someone from ARM Ltd ack it,
because they will know the code much better than I do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists