linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130830174201.GM13330@kvack.org>
Date:	Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:42:01 -0400
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:38:25AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > -                       aio_ring_file->f_path.dentry->d_count,
> > +                       aio_ring_file->f_path.dentry->d_lockref.count,
> 
> This is wrong. If you really want the dentry count (which I doubt, I
> don't see why this code would care _even_ just for a debug printout),
> you should use

Agreed -- it was just debugging code from initial development of the code, 
so I just ended up deleting it instead.

		-ben
-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/