linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for Renesys H8/300 architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:14:20 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	IDE-ML <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for Renesys H8/300 architecture

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>
> I would not mind if Linus would agree to pull it right away for 3.12,
> but that seems to be a bit on the fast side.

I'm ok with code deletion patches, I don't think that would be a
problem. I didn't check them, but I assume this is all literally just
removing code that is conditional on h8/300 config options?

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/