[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzhiLMdSCnePX0OgFUXo7KC+aomM8URppDuV+7xUaaSpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:43:11 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless
update of refcount
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com> wrote:
>
> The prepend_path() isn't all due to getcwd. The correct profile should be
Ugh. I really think that prepend_path() should just be rewritten to
run entirely under RCU.
Then we can remove *all* the stupid locking, and replace it with doing
a read-lock on the rename sequence count, and repeating if requited.
That shouldn't even be hard to do, it just requires mindless massaging
and being careful.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists