[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1377905319.2070.38.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:28:39 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
bernie@...eler.com, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: do_div() silently truncates "base" to 32bit
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 15:48 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/30/13 15:14, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> > But another question still remains: why compiler does not warn that
> > size truncation happens? How to prevent bugs like CFQ one in the
> > future? Should we add a compile-time assert to do_div() to prevent
> > passing 64 numbers in "base" macro parameter?
> That sounds like a fine idea to me.
Geert thought so too and submitted a patch
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg26788.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists