[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130831190117.GA2213@swordfish>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 22:01:17 +0300
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [sched next] overflowed cpu time for kernel threads in
/proc/PID/stat
On (08/31/13 01:04), Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> But stime should always be below rtime due to the calculation done by scale_stime()
> which roughly sums up to:
>
> stime = (stime / stime + utime) * rtime
>
> So this shouldn't happen.
>
> I couldn't manage to reproduce it though. Can you still trigger it with latest -next?
>
> Thanks.
Hello,
I can't pull current -next (away from good network connection for a
couple of days). What I have is 3.11.0-rc7-next-20130829:
ps aux | grep rcu
root 8 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Aug30 0:00 [rcuc/0]
root 9 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Aug30 0:00 [rcub/0]
root 10 21376376 0.0 0 0 ? S Aug30 21114581:36 [rcu_preempt]
root 11 21376376 0.0 0 0 ? S Aug30 21114581:35 [rcuop/0]
root 12 21376376 0.0 0 0 ? S Aug30 21114581:35 [rcuop/1]
cat /proc/10/stat
10 (rcu_preempt) S 2 0 0 0 -1 2129984 0 0 0 0 1844674407370 715 0 0 20 0 1 0 10 0 0 18446744073709551615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2147483647 0 18446744073709551615 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists