linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: don't allow governor limits to be changed when it is disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 01 Sep 2013 15:29:20 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: don't allow governor limits to be changed when it is disabled

On Sunday, September 01, 2013 11:56:09 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 1 September 2013 10:56, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Its better if we can get these in for 3.11, otherwise we need to get them in the
> > stable tree..
> 
> They can't get into 3.11 due to two reasons..
> - I haven't tested them over 3.11 but linux-next/master.
> - Few more dependency patches might also be required for 3.11..
> 
> So get them into 3.12-rc1 if they look okay to you :)

I'm going to do that, but please add explanation to the [2/2] changelog.

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/