lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUWPUDorK+9KRD-H3FpbDeC_7LMatzrYk35jZk13vNuLBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 Sep 2013 17:45:03 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
	"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] spinlock: A new lockref structure for lockless
 update of refcount

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like this is now 10x faster: ~2.66Mloops (debug) VS.
>> ~26.60Mloops (no-debug).
>
> Ok, that's getting to be in the right ballpark.
>
> But your profile is still odd.
>
>> Samples: 159K of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 76968896763
>>  12,79%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] irq_return
>>   4,36%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __ticket_spin_lock
>
> If you do the profile with "-g", what are the top callers of this? You
> shouldn't see any spinlock load from the path lookup, but you have all
> these other things going on..
>

$ sudo ~/src/linux-kernel/linux/tools/perf/perf record -g -e cycles:pp
./scripts/t_lockref_from-linus
Total loops: 26205085
[ perf record: Woken up 77 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 19.778 MB perf.data (~864092 samples) ]


$ sudo ~/src/linux-kernel/linux/tools/perf/perf report <--- I used
here with -f option, the last one, dropped here.

Samples: 160K of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 77003901089
+  12,46%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] irq_return
+   4,86%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] lockref_get_or_lock
+   4,42%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __ticket_spin_lock
+   4,28%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __acct_update_integrals
+   3,97%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] user_exit
+   3,04%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] local_clock
+   2,71%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] kmem_cache_alloc
+   2,50%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] link_path_walk
+   2,46%  t_lockref_from-  libc-2.15.so          [.] __xstat64
+   2,38%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] kmem_cache_free
+   1,96%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] path_lookupat
+   1,88%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __d_lookup_rcu
+   1,87%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] tracesys
+   1,84%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k]
rcu_eqs_exit_common.isra.43
+   1,81%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k]
rcu_eqs_enter_common.isra.45
+   1,80%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] user_enter
+   1,79%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] sched_clock_cpu
+   1,61%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] native_read_tsc
+   1,56%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] cp_new_stat
+   1,52%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] lockref_put_or_lock
+   1,51%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] account_system_time
+   1,46%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] path_init
+   1,46%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] copy_user_generic_unrolled
+   1,42%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] syscall_trace_enter
+   1,38%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] jiffies_to_timeval
+   1,32%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] lookup_fast
+   1,31%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] native_sched_clock
+   1,24%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] getname_flags
+   1,17%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] vfs_getattr
+   1,15%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] get_vtime_delta
+   1,03%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] syscall_trace_leave
+   0,95%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] generic_fillattr
+   0,94%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] user_path_at_empty
+   0,93%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] system_call_after_swapgs
+   0,93%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] account_user_time
+   0,89%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] strncpy_from_user
+   0,86%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] complete_walk
+   0,80%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] filename_lookup
+   0,80%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] vfs_fstatat
+   0,78%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] generic_permission
+   0,77%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __ticket_spin_unlock
+   0,73%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __inode_permission
+   0,69%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] vtime_account_user
+   0,66%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] d_rcu_to_refcount
+   0,61%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] common_perm
+   0,60%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] rcu_eqs_enter
+   0,59%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] dput
+   0,54%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] vtime_user_enter
+   0,51%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] cpuacct_account_field
+   0,50%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] mntput
+   0,48%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] lg_local_lock
+   0,48%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] apparmor_inode_getattr
+   0,45%  t_lockref_from-  t_lockref_from-linus  [.] start_routine
+   0,45%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __vtime_account_system
Press '?' for help on key bindings

- Sedat -

>>   4,36%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __acct_update_integrals
>>   4,07%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] user_exit
>>   3,12%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] local_clock
>>   2,83%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] lockref_get_or_lock
>>   2,73%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] kmem_cache_alloc
>>   2,62%  t_lockref_from-  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] __d_lookup_rcu
>
> You're spending more time on the task stats than on the actual lookup.
> Maybe you should turn off CONFIG_TASKSTATS..But why that whole
> irq_return thing? Odd.
>

Yes, I have CONFIG_TASKSTATS=y.
I can try a -4 build w/o it.

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ