linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rwsem: add rwsem_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Sep 2013 01:32:36 -0700
From:	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To:	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
Cc:	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rwsem: add rwsem_is_contended

Hi Josef,

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com> wrote:
> Btrfs uses an rwsem to control access to its extent tree.  Threads will hold a
> read lock on this rwsem while they scan the extent tree, and if need_resched()
> they will drop the lock and schedule.  The transaction commit needs to take a
> write lock for this rwsem for a very short period to switch out the commit
> roots.  If there are a lot of threads doing this caching operation we can starve
> out the committers which slows everybody out.  To address this we want to add
> this functionality to see if our rwsem has anybody waiting to take a write lock
> so we can drop it and schedule for a bit to allow the commit to continue.
> Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>

FYI, I once tried to introduce something like this before, but my use
case was pretty weak so it was not accepted at the time. I don't think
there were any objections to the API itself though, and I think it's
potentially a good idea if you use case justifies it.

Two comments:

- Note that there are two rwsem implementations - if you are going to
add functionality to rwsem.h you want to add the same functionality in
rwsem-spinlock.h as well.

- I would prefer if you could avoid taking the wait_lock in your
rwsem.h implementation. In your use case (read lock is known to be
held), checking for sem->count < 0 would be sufficient to indicate a
writer is queued (or getting onto the queue). In the general case,
some architectures have the various values set up so that
RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS - for these
architectures at least, you can check for waiters by looking if the
lowest bit of RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS is set in sem->count.

-- 
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/