[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-23f0d2093c789e612185180c468fa09063834e87@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 00:40:21 -0700
From: tip-bot for Joonsoo Kim <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, pjt@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Factor out code to should_we_balance()
Commit-ID: 23f0d2093c789e612185180c468fa09063834e87
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/23f0d2093c789e612185180c468fa09063834e87
Author: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:36:42 +0900
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 08:27:34 +0200
sched: Factor out code to should_we_balance()
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
this checking at update_sg_lb_stats(), except saving one iteration
for sched_group_cpus.
In this patch, I factor out this checking to should_we_balance() function.
And before doing actual work for load_balancing, check whether this cpu is
appropriate to balance via should_we_balance(). If this cpu is not
a candidate for balancing, it quit the work immediately.
With this change, we can save two memset cost and can expect better
compiler optimization.
Below is result of this patch.
* Vanilla *
text data bss dec hex filename
34499 1136 116 35751 8ba7 kernel/sched/fair.o
* Patched *
text data bss dec hex filename
34243 1136 116 35495 8aa7 kernel/sched/fair.o
In addition, rename @balance to @continue_balancing in order to represent
its purpose more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
[ s/should_balance/continue_balancing/g ]
Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
[ Made style changes and a fix in should_we_balance(). ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1375778203-31343-3-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 8aa217f..9a6daf8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4463,22 +4463,17 @@ fix_small_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *group)
* @group: sched_group whose statistics are to be updated.
* @load_idx: Load index of sched_domain of this_cpu for load calc.
* @local_group: Does group contain this_cpu.
- * @balance: Should we balance.
* @sgs: variable to hold the statistics for this group.
*/
static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
struct sched_group *group, int load_idx,
- int local_group, int *balance, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
+ int local_group, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
{
unsigned long nr_running, max_nr_running, min_nr_running;
unsigned long load, max_cpu_load, min_cpu_load;
- unsigned int balance_cpu = -1, first_idle_cpu = 0;
unsigned long avg_load_per_task = 0;
int i;
- if (local_group)
- balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(group);
-
/* Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group */
max_cpu_load = 0;
min_cpu_load = ~0UL;
@@ -4492,12 +4487,6 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
if (local_group) {
- if (idle_cpu(i) && !first_idle_cpu &&
- cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_group_mask(group))) {
- first_idle_cpu = 1;
- balance_cpu = i;
- }
-
load = target_load(i, load_idx);
} else {
load = source_load(i, load_idx);
@@ -4519,22 +4508,9 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
sgs->idle_cpus++;
}
- /*
- * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group
- * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above
- * domains. In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
- * to do the newly idle load balance.
- */
- if (local_group) {
- if (env->idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
- if (balance_cpu != env->dst_cpu) {
- *balance = 0;
- return;
- }
- update_group_power(env->sd, env->dst_cpu);
- } else if (time_after_eq(jiffies, group->sgp->next_update))
- update_group_power(env->sd, env->dst_cpu);
- }
+ if (local_group && (env->idle != CPU_NEWLY_IDLE ||
+ time_after_eq(jiffies, group->sgp->next_update)))
+ update_group_power(env->sd, env->dst_cpu);
/* Adjust by relative CPU power of the group */
sgs->avg_load = (sgs->group_load*SCHED_POWER_SCALE) / group->sgp->power;
@@ -4613,7 +4589,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env,
* @sds: variable to hold the statistics for this sched_domain.
*/
static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
- int *balance, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+ struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
{
struct sched_domain *child = env->sd->child;
struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
@@ -4630,10 +4606,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
local_group = cpumask_test_cpu(env->dst_cpu, sched_group_cpus(sg));
memset(&sgs, 0, sizeof(sgs));
- update_sg_lb_stats(env, sg, load_idx, local_group, balance, &sgs);
-
- if (local_group && !(*balance))
- return;
+ update_sg_lb_stats(env, sg, load_idx, local_group, &sgs);
sds->total_load += sgs.group_load;
sds->total_pwr += sg->sgp->power;
@@ -4866,8 +4839,6 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
* to restore balance.
*
* @env: The load balancing environment.
- * @balance: Pointer to a variable indicating if this_cpu
- * is the appropriate cpu to perform load balancing at this_level.
*
* Returns: - the busiest group if imbalance exists.
* - If no imbalance and user has opted for power-savings balance,
@@ -4875,7 +4846,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
* put to idle by rebalancing its tasks onto our group.
*/
static struct sched_group *
-find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env, int *balance)
+find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
{
struct sd_lb_stats sds;
@@ -4885,14 +4856,7 @@ find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env, int *balance)
* Compute the various statistics relavent for load balancing at
* this level.
*/
- update_sd_lb_stats(env, balance, &sds);
-
- /*
- * this_cpu is not the appropriate cpu to perform load balancing at
- * this level.
- */
- if (!(*balance))
- goto ret;
+ update_sd_lb_stats(env, &sds);
if ((env->idle == CPU_IDLE || env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) &&
check_asym_packing(env, &sds))
@@ -4956,7 +4920,6 @@ force_balance:
return sds.busiest;
out_balanced:
-ret:
env->imbalance = 0;
return NULL;
}
@@ -5043,13 +5006,47 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env)
static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data);
+static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
+{
+ struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups;
+ struct cpumask *sg_cpus, *sg_mask;
+ int cpu, balance_cpu = -1;
+
+ /*
+ * In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's
+ * to do the newly idle load balance.
+ */
+ if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
+ return 1;
+
+ sg_cpus = sched_group_cpus(sg);
+ sg_mask = sched_group_mask(sg);
+ /* Try to find first idle cpu */
+ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, sg_cpus, env->cpus) {
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sg_mask) || !idle_cpu(cpu))
+ continue;
+
+ balance_cpu = cpu;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (balance_cpu == -1)
+ balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(sg);
+
+ /*
+ * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group
+ * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above domains.
+ */
+ return balance_cpu != env->dst_cpu;
+}
+
/*
* Check this_cpu to ensure it is balanced within domain. Attempt to move
* tasks if there is an imbalance.
*/
static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
- int *balance)
+ int *continue_balancing)
{
int ld_moved, cur_ld_moved, active_balance = 0;
struct sched_group *group;
@@ -5079,11 +5076,12 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
redo:
- group = find_busiest_group(&env, balance);
-
- if (*balance == 0)
+ if (!should_we_balance(&env)) {
+ *continue_balancing = 0;
goto out_balanced;
+ }
+ group = find_busiest_group(&env);
if (!group) {
schedstat_inc(sd, lb_nobusyg[idle]);
goto out_balanced;
@@ -5296,7 +5294,7 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
unsigned long interval;
- int balance = 1;
+ int continue_balancing = 1;
if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
continue;
@@ -5304,7 +5302,8 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) {
/* If we've pulled tasks over stop searching: */
pulled_task = load_balance(this_cpu, this_rq,
- sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, &balance);
+ sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
+ &continue_balancing);
}
interval = msecs_to_jiffies(sd->balance_interval);
@@ -5542,7 +5541,7 @@ void update_max_interval(void)
*/
static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
{
- int balance = 1;
+ int continue_balancing = 1;
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long interval;
struct sched_domain *sd;
@@ -5574,7 +5573,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
}
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
- if (load_balance(cpu, rq, sd, idle, &balance)) {
+ if (load_balance(cpu, rq, sd, idle, &continue_balancing)) {
/*
* The LBF_SOME_PINNED logic could have changed
* env->dst_cpu, so we can't know our idle
@@ -5597,7 +5596,7 @@ out:
* CPU in our sched group which is doing load balancing more
* actively.
*/
- if (!balance)
+ if (!continue_balancing)
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists