[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522441E9.8040809@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 15:44:41 +0800
From: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@...il.com>
CC: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.11-rc7:BUG: soft lockup
On 2013/9/2 14:06, Baoquan He wrote:
> Hi both,
>
> Thanks for your patches. I tried to test your patches, first the 2nd
> one, namely Hillf's patch, it's OK. Then when I wanted to reproduce and
> test Cong's patch, it failed to happen again.
>
> I remember this bug happened randomly at the very beginning,
> just after kernel compiling it always happened one day.
>
> So maybe when it happened again, I will test your patch separately.
>
> Baoquan
> Thanks
>
> On 08/31/2013 11:25 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Cc'ing netdev
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Baoquan He <baoquan.he@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I tried the 3.11.0-rc7+ on x86_64, and after bootup, the soft lockup bug
>>>> happened.
>>>>
>>>> [ 48.895000] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [ebtables:444]
>>>> [ 48.901191] Modules linked in: bnep(F) bluetooth(F) ebtables(F)
>>>> ip6table_filter(F) ip6_tables(F) rfkill(F) snd_hda_intel(F+)
>>>> snd_hda_codec(F) snd_hwdep(F) snd_seq(F) sn)
>>>> [ 48.950034] CPU: 1 PID: 444 Comm: ebtables Tainted: GF D
>>>> 3.11.0-rc7+ #1
>>>> [ 48.957433] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Z420 Workstation/1589,
>>>> BIOS J61 v01.02 03/09/2012
>>>> [ 48.966131] task: ffff88040c2dc650 ti: ffff8804187d2000 task.ti:
>>>> ffff8804187d2000
>>>> [ 48.973610] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812e57a7>] [<ffffffff812e57a7>]
>>>> strcmp+0x27/0x40
>>>> [ 48.981119] RSP: 0018:ffff8804187d3db8 EFLAGS: 00000246
>>>> [ 48.986430] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007fffda942730 RCX:
>>>> ffff8804187d3fd8
>>>> [ 48.993566] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8804187d3e01 RDI:
>>>> ffffffff81cb8a39
>>>> [ 49.000707] RBP: ffff8804187d3db8 R08: 00000000fffffff2 R09:
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 49.007841] R10: 0000000000000163 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
>>>> ffffffff8128300c
>>>> [ 49.014972] R13: ffff8804187d3d98 R14: ffff8804187d3ef4 R15:
>>>> 0000000000000004
>>>> [ 49.022112] FS: 00007faab6589740(0000) GS:ffff88042fc80000(0000)
>>>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>> [ 49.030194] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>> [ 49.035942] CR2: 0000003f0d810414 CR3: 000000040d2cc000 CR4:
>>>> 00000000000407e0
>>>> [ 49.043077] Stack:
>>>> [ 49.045096] ffff8804187d3de8 ffffffffa0249674 0000000000000080
>>>> ffffffff81cb8180
>>>> [ 49.052559] 00007fffda942730 ffff8804187d3ef4 ffff8804187d3ea0
>>>> ffffffffa02497a9
>>>> [ 49.060020] 0000000000000000 00007265746c6966 0000003f0d7b92c0
>>>> 00007fffda942850
>>>> [ 49.067487] Call Trace:
>>>> [ 49.069949] [<ffffffffa0249674>]
>>>> find_inlist_lock.constprop.16+0x54/0x100 [ebtables]
>>>> [ 49.077779] [<ffffffffa02497a9>] do_ebt_get_ctl+0x89/0x1d0 [ebtables]
>>>> [ 49.084306] [<ffffffff81551ca8>] nf_getsockopt+0x68/0x90
>>>> [ 49.089717] [<ffffffff81560d40>] ip_getsockopt+0x80/0xa0
>>>> [ 49.095113] [<ffffffff815835c5>] raw_getsockopt+0x25/0x50
>>>> [ 49.100588] [<ffffffff8150ddd4>] sock_common_getsockopt+0x14/0x20
>>>> [ 49.106766] [<ffffffff8150d208>] SyS_getsockopt+0x68/0xd0
>>>> [ 49.112257] [<ffffffff8162c682>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>> [ 49.118260] Code: 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 eb 0e 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00
>>>> 00 00 00 84 c0 74 1c 48 83 c7 01 0f b6 47 ff 48 83 c6 01 3a 46 ff 74 eb
>>>> 19 c0 <83> c8 01 5d c3 0f 1
>>>> [ 76.925880] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [ebtables:444]
>>>> [ 76.932069] Modules linked in: bnep(F) bluetooth(F) ebtables(F)
>>>> ip6table_filter(F) ip6_tables(F) rfkill(F) snd_hda_intel(F+)
>>>> snd_hda_codec(F) snd_hwdep(F) snd_seq(F) sn)
>>>> [ 76.980847] CPU: 1 PID: 444 Comm: ebtables Tainted: GF D
>>>> 3.11.0-rc7+ #1
>>>> [ 76.988245] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Z420 Workstation/1589,
>>>> BIOS J61 v01.02 03/09/2012
>>>> [ 76.996940] task: ffff88040c2dc650 ti: ffff8804187d2000 task.ti:
>>>> ffff8804187d2000
>>>> [ 77.004426] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812e5784>] [<ffffffff812e5784>]
>>>> strcmp+0x4/0x40
>>>> [ 77.011849] RSP: 0018:ffff8804187d3db8 EFLAGS: 00000212
>>>> [ 77.017163] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 00007fffda942730 RCX:
>>>> ffff8804187d3fd8
>>>> [ 77.024304] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8804187d3e00 RDI:
>>>> ffffffff81cb8a38
>>>> [ 77.031434] RBP: ffff8804187d3db8 R08: 00000000fffffff2 R09:
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 77.038566] R10: 0000000000000163 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
>>>> ffffffff8128300c
>>>> [ 77.045699] R13: ffff8804187d3d98 R14: ffff8804187d3ef4 R15:
>>>> 0000000000000004
>>>> [ 77.052842] FS: 00007faab6589740(0000) GS:ffff88042fc80000(0000)
>>>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>> [ 77.060934] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>>>> [ 77.066668] CR2: 0000003f0d810414 CR3: 000000040d2cc000 CR4:
>>>> 00000000000407e0
>>>> [ 77.073799] Stack:
>>>> [ 77.075818] ffff8804187d3de8 ffffffffa0249674 0000000000000080
>>>> ffffffff81cb8180
>>>> [ 77.083287] 00007fffda942730 ffff8804187d3ef4 ffff8804187d3ea0
>>>> ffffffffa02497a9
>>>> [ 77.090749] 0000000000000000 00007265746c6966 0000003f0d7b92c0
>>>> 00007fffda942850
>>>> [ 77.098215] Call Trace:
>>>> [ 77.100668] [<ffffffffa0249674>]
>>>> find_inlist_lock.constprop.16+0x54/0x100 [ebtables]
>>>> [ 77.108500] [<ffffffffa02497a9>] do_ebt_get_ctl+0x89/0x1d0 [ebtables]
>>>> [ 77.115035] [<ffffffff81551ca8>] nf_getsockopt+0x68/0x90
>>>> [ 77.120438] [<ffffffff81560d40>] ip_getsockopt+0x80/0xa0
>>>> [ 77.125845] [<ffffffff815835c5>] raw_getsockopt+0x25/0x50
>>>> [ 77.131328] [<ffffffff8150ddd4>] sock_common_getsockopt+0x14/0x20
>>>> [ 77.137515] [<ffffffff8150d208>] SyS_getsockopt+0x68/0xd0
>>>> [ 77.143011] [<ffffffff8162c682>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>>>> [ 77.149019] Code: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 83 c6 01 0f b6 4e ff 48 83
>>>> c2 01 84 c9 88 4a ff 75 ed 5d c3 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48
>>>> 89 e5 <eb> 0e 66 2e 0f 1f 8
>>>
>>> Does the following patch help?
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
>>> index ac78024..4a0ec8f 100644
>>> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
>>> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
>>> @@ -1503,6 +1503,10 @@ static int do_ebt_get_ctl(struct sock *sk, int
>>> cmd, void __user *user, int *len)
>>> if (copy_from_user(&tmp, user, sizeof(tmp)))
>>> return -EFAULT;
>>>
>>> + if (memscan(tmp.name, '\0', EBT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN) ==
>>> + (tmp.name + EBT_TABLE_MAXNAMELEN))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> t = find_table_lock(net, tmp.name, &ret, &ebt_mutex);
>>> if (!t)
>>> return ret;
>>> --
>>>
>> release lock!!
>>
>> --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c Sat Aug 31 11:12:54 2013
>> +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c Sat Aug 31 11:15:24 2013
>> @@ -332,8 +332,10 @@ find_inlist_lock_noload(struct list_head
>> return NULL;
>>
>> list_for_each_entry(e, head, list) {
>> - if (strcmp(e->name, name) == 0)
>> + if (strcmp(e->name, name) == 0) {
>> + mutex_unlock(mutex);
>> return e;
>> + }
>> }
>> *error = -ENOENT;
>> mutex_unlock(mutex);
>> --
>
please try this patch and give me the result, thanks.
Return the correct value if mutex_lock_interruptible() failed, avoid
confusion with that the modules is not exist, and deal with the return
value in right way.
if mutex_lock_interrupt() failed, sh
Signed-off-by: root <root@...ux-yocto.site>
---
net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index ac78024..e7fe9f8 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -322,17 +322,14 @@ static inline void *
find_inlist_lock_noload(struct list_head *head, const char *name, int *error,
struct mutex *mutex)
{
- struct {
- struct list_head list;
- char name[EBT_FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN];
- } *e;
+ struct ebt_table *e;
*error = mutex_lock_interruptible(mutex);
if (*error != 0)
- return NULL;
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINTR);
list_for_each_entry(e, head, list) {
- if (strcmp(e->name, name) == 0)
+ if (strcmp(e->name, name) == 0 && try_module_get(e->me))
return e;
}
*error = -ENOENT;
@@ -1005,7 +1002,7 @@ static int do_replace_finish(struct net *net, struct ebt_replace *repl,
goto free_counterstmp;
t = find_table_lock(net, repl->name, &ret, &ebt_mutex);
- if (!t) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(t)) {
ret = -ENOENT;
goto free_iterate;
}
@@ -1284,7 +1281,7 @@ static int do_update_counters(struct net *net, const char *name,
return -ENOMEM;
t = find_table_lock(net, name, &ret, &ebt_mutex);
- if (!t)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(t))
goto free_tmp;
if (num_counters != t->private->nentries) {
@@ -1504,7 +1501,7 @@ static int do_ebt_get_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd, void __user *user, int *len)
return -EFAULT;
t = find_table_lock(net, tmp.name, &ret, &ebt_mutex);
- if (!t)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(t))
return ret;
switch(cmd) {
@@ -2319,7 +2316,7 @@ static int compat_do_ebt_get_ctl(struct sock *sk, int cmd,
return -EFAULT;
t = find_table_lock(net, tmp.name, &ret, &ebt_mutex);
- if (!t)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(t))
return ret;
xt_compat_lock(NFPROTO_BRIDGE);
--
1.8.2.1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists