[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOtvUMcKprmyKdi-+TJNvCNqaDv=6WLxeATkJtFe+b1c1bSSGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:02:55 +0300
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig.debug: Add FRAME_POINTER anti-dependency for ARC
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Vineet Gupta
<Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
> Frame pointer on ARC doesn't serve the conventional purpose of stack
> unwinding due to the typical way ABI designates it's usage.
More out of curiosity to understand the platform better than actual
review - can you explain a little what
you meant by this statement?
Is this statement because of the use of write back mode with ld/st to
or not related?
Thanks,
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef
Chief Coffee Drinker
gilad@...yossef.com
Israel Cell: +972-52-8260388
US Cell: +1-973-8260388
http://benyossef.com
"If you take a class in large-scale robotics, can you end up in a
situation where the homework eats your dog?"
-- Jean-Baptiste Queru
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists