[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130902115157.GQ7376@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:21:57 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: kgene.kim@...sung.com, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dmaengine: add driver for Samsung s3c24xx SoCs
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:13:51AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> This adds a new driver to support the s3c24xx dma using the dmaengine
> and makes the old one in mach-s3c24xx obsolete in the long run.
>
> Conceptually the s3c24xx-dma feels like a distant relative of the pl08x
> with numerous virtual channels being mapped to a lot less physical ones.
> The driver therefore borrows a lot from the amba-pl08x driver in this
> regard. Functionality-wise the driver gains a memcpy ability in addition
> to the slave_sg one.
>
> The driver supports both the method for requesting the peripheral used
> by SoCs before the S3C2443 and the different method for S3C2443 and later.
>
> On earlier SoCs the hardware channels usable for specific peripherals is
> constrainted while on later SoCs all channels can be used for any peripheral.
>
> Tested on a s3c2416-based board, memcpy using the dmatest module and
> slave_sg partially using the spi-s3c64xx driver.
>
> +static int s3c24xx_dma_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct s3c24xx_dma_chan *s3cchan = to_s3c24xx_dma_chan(chan);
> + struct s3c24xx_dma_engine *s3cdma = s3cchan->host;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /* Controls applicable to inactive channels */
> + if (cmd == DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG)
> + return s3c24xx_dma_set_runtime_config(s3cchan,
> + (struct dma_slave_config *)arg);
> +
> + /*
> + * Anything succeeds on channels with no physical allocation and
> + * no queued transfers.
> + */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&s3cchan->vc.lock, flags);
> + if (!s3cchan->phy && !s3cchan->at) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s3cchan->vc.lock, flags);
> + return 0;
this can be bad cmd or terminating already closed channel, return 0 doesnt make
sense
> + }
> +
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
why not DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG in this switch to make it look simpler...
> +static enum dma_status s3c24xx_dma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
> + dma_cookie_t cookie, struct dma_tx_state *txstate)
> +{
> + struct s3c24xx_dma_chan *s3cchan = to_s3c24xx_dma_chan(chan);
> + struct virt_dma_desc *vd;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + enum dma_status ret;
> + size_t bytes = 0;
> +
> + ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
> + if (ret == DMA_SUCCESS)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * There's no point calculating the residue if there's
> + * no txstate to store the value.
> + */
> + if (!txstate)
> + return ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&s3cchan->vc.lock, flags);
> + ret = dma_cookie_status(chan, cookie, txstate);
you are checking the cookie status twice, if you check txstate (which should be
valid anyways), then you avoid the duplication
> + if (ret != DMA_SUCCESS) {
> + struct s3c24xx_txd *txd;
> + struct s3c24xx_sg *dsg;
> +
> + vd = vchan_find_desc(&s3cchan->vc, cookie);
> + if (vd) {
> + /* On the issued list, so hasn't been processed yet */
> + txd = to_s3c24xx_txd(&vd->tx);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(dsg, &txd->dsg_list, node)
> + bytes += dsg->len;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Currently running, so sum over the pending sg's and
> + * the currently active one.
> + */
> + txd = s3cchan->at;
> +
> + dsg = list_entry(txd->at, struct s3c24xx_sg, node);
> + list_for_each_entry_from(dsg, &txd->dsg_list, node);
> + bytes += dsg->len;
> +
> + bytes += s3c24xx_dma_getbytes_chan(s3cchan);
> + }
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&s3cchan->vc.lock, flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * This cookie not complete yet
> + * Get number of bytes left in the active transactions and queue
> + */
> + dma_set_residue(txstate, bytes);
> +
> + /* Whether waiting or running, we're in progress */
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Initialize a descriptor to be used by memcpy submit
> + */
> +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *s3c24xx_dma_prep_memcpy(
> + struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dest, dma_addr_t src,
> + size_t len, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct s3c24xx_dma_chan *s3cchan = to_s3c24xx_dma_chan(chan);
> + struct s3c24xx_dma_engine *s3cdma = s3cchan->host;
> + struct s3c24xx_txd *txd;
> + struct s3c24xx_sg *dsg;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&s3cdma->pdev->dev, "prepare memcpy of %d bytes from %s\n",
> + len, s3cchan->name);
> +
> + if ((len & S3C24XX_DCON_TC_MASK) != len) {
> + dev_err(&s3cdma->pdev->dev, "memcpy size %d to large\n", len);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + txd = s3c24xx_dma_get_txd();
> + if (!txd)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + dsg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct s3c24xx_sg), GFP_NOWAIT);
sizeof(*dsg)
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists