[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1DD289F6464F0949A2FCA5AA6DC23F827F480B@039-SN2MPN1-011.039d.mgd.msft.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 02:18:19 +0000
From: Xiubo Li-B47053 <B47053@...escale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Guo Shawn-R65073 <r65073@...escale.com>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"ian.campbell@...rix.com" <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for
Freescale FTM PWM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for
> Freescale FTM PWM
>
> Should have at least something w/regards to a commit message.
>
I have sent a V2 patch and have added it.
> > + used to encode the polarity of PWM output. Set bit 0 of the third
> > +in PWM
> > + specifier to 1 for inverse polarity & set to 0 for normal polarity.
> > +- fsl,pwm-clk-ps: the ftm0 pwm clock's prescaler, divide-by 2^n(n = 0
> ~ 7).
> > +- fsl,pwm-cpwm: Center-Aligned PWM (CPWM) mode.
>
> Should describe this in more detail, what does the value actually mean
> for what modes there are?
>
It's maybe a very useful feature for FTM core, but for PWM is not.
This isn't needed any more for PWM, and in V2 patch I have removed CPWM mode.
> > +- fsl,pwm-number: the number of PWM devices, and is must equal to the
> > +number
> > + of "fsl,pwm-channels".
>
> If they must be equal why do we need both?
>
I have replaced both of them too in V2.
> > +- fsl,pwm-channels: the channels' order which is be used for pwm in
> > +ftm0
> > + module, and they must be one or some of 0 ~ 7, because the ftm0
> > +only has
> > + 8 channels can be used.
> > +- for very channel, the revlatived the pinctrl should be at least two
> > +state
>
> revlatived?
>
This too.
--
Best Regards.
Xiubo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists