[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52253607.9010907@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:06:15 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] x86, mm: Update min_pfn_mapped in add_pfn_range_mapped().
Hi Yinghai,
On 09/03/2013 02:41 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
......
>
> Nak, you can not move that.
>
> min_pfn_mapped should not be updated before init_range_memory_mapping
> is returned. as it need to refer old min_pfn_mapped.
> and init_range_memory_mapping still init mapping from low to high locally.
> min_pfn_mapped can not be updated too early.
The current code is like this:
init_mem_mapping()
{
while (from high to low) {
init_range_memory_mapping()
{
/* Here is from low to high */
for (from low to high) {
init_memory_mapping()
{
for () {
/* Need to refer min_pfn_mapped here */
kernel_physical_mapping_init();
}
/* So if updating min_pfn_mapped here, it is too low */
add_pfn_range_mapped();
}
}
}
}
}
How about change the "for (from low to high)" in
init_range_memory_mapping() to
"for_rev(from high to low)" ?
Then we can update min_pfn_mapped in add_pfn_range_mapped().
And also, the outer loop is from high to low, we can change the inner
loop to be from high
to low too.
I think updating min_pfn_mapped in init_mem_mapping() is less readable.
And min_pfn_mapped
and max_pfn_mapped should be updated together.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists