[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA2307514160B@IN01WEMBXA.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 07:34:53 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: "sedat.dilek@...il.com" <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
CC: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave.bueso@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Gonzalez <jgonzalez@...ets.cl>
Subject: Re: ipc-msg broken again on 3.11-rc7?
On 09/03/2013 12:46 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Just FYI:
>
> Linux Testing Project (LTP) will do a new release in the 1st September week.
> Some IPC test-suites were reworked.
> Manfred can you look at them ("...msgctl08 uses one queue for each
> thread pair.").
> ( Might be worth to throw some words at the LTP mailing-list (that
> test-case is not ideal, etc.)? )
>
Well we had a userspace test working before (3.10) and now it won't. In Linux
world that is not something we do in general - although there could be exceptions
because the test is not idea etc - anyways not my call !
However assuming we are going ahead with debugging this - can you please confirm
whether you see the issue on x86 as well as I have not tested that ? I vaguely
remember one of your earlier posts suggested you did
Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists