linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH trivial] block/ioctl.c: let code match 'kernel code style'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5225B2BA.5080001@asianux.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:58:18 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC:	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] block/ioctl.c: let code match 'kernel code style'

On 09/03/2013 05:27 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
> 
>> Do you mean "coding style", not "colding style"? (or it is my
>> misunderstanding?).
>>
>>
>>> You're not going to run checkpatch.pl on the whole kernel tree and fix
>>> all the complaints, are you?
>>>
>>
>> I am not going to, it seems that may be the 'job' of Joe and
>> trivial@...nel.org?
> 
> FWIW, I am not generally accepting pure code reformatting patches.
> 

Yes, it is really not quite efficient to only accept pure code
reformatting patches (it must contain another 'things').
;-)


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/